The Other Thanksgiving Story
Editors’ Note: This article was published last year at Thanksgiving. This year, 2024, the context of our gratitude has changed dramatically. Let us be grateful that the November 5th election has positioned America to reclaim the miracle of its founding and celebrate the harsh blow to the radical leftist and woke revolution that dangerously accelerated under the terminating Biden presidency with the victory of Donald Trump. Let us go forward and be passionate citizens in a reforming and correcting civil society of free Americans. So much to be truly grateful for this Thanksgiving.
It really is about being grateful, which is something too few of our spoiled citizens appreciate. But since the holiday is being weaponized by “woke culture”, there are some other elements of the story to think about.
The short version, the way it is taught today, is that greedy Pilgrims landed in Plymouth Bay. Half of the Pilgrims died from disease and starvation the first winter. Befriended by kind Indians, they barely survived and gave thanks to the Almighty. Then, the Pilgrims went on to colonize the natives. Today, one of the Indian tribes most closely associated with the Pilgrims regrets they gave them help.
Thus like Columbus Day, much of the meaning of Thanksgiving gets lost in the culture wars of today. It has been turned into a story about the evils of colonizing and European culture, and an elevation of the indigenous to almost mythical levels.
It really is about being grateful, which is something too few of our spoiled citizens appreciate. But since the holiday is being weaponized by “woke culture”, there are some other elements of the story to think about.
What are the sheer odds of things coming together the way they did? If not a product of Divine Providence, the story is remarkable because of the extremely low odds things could unfold the way they did.
One of the first is being blown off course and landing precisely at a spot where native people had been wiped out by a plague. If one had to land in cold Massachusetts, they by chance found a good spot. They found depopulated villages, mass graves, and a Wampanoag society devasted well before the Pilgrims arrived. They did not seize native land, it was abandoned.
As to the help they received, the story of Squanto is remarkable just for its improbability. Taken likely by English sailors fishing the region, he was sold into slavery, wound up in Spain, learned European languages, was befriended by religious monks, and remarkably then returned to his people who had been wiped out. He did not die in slavery, did not succumb to European diseases, and was likely one of the only English-speaking natives in the whole region. And, he showed up just in the nick of time and preferred to live his life among the English until his death. What are the odds of that?
His introduction was just as improbable. Another Indian, who had learned some English named Samoset contacted the Pilgrims. His first words were reported to be “Do you have any beer”, a question that can be appreciated today as well. It was through this colorful introduction that Squanto met the Pilgrims and helped them learn planting procedures.
Then there is the strategic alliance formed between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.
The Indians of North America had not reached the level of sophistication of their fellow tribesmen in South America. They did not have the wheel, work metals, a recorded language, or writing. They were Stone Age people set on a collision course with a more technologically advanced “alien” civilization. Wherever that occurred, in Mexico, Peru, New Zealand, or Australia, the outcome would not be good for the natives.
The leader of the Wampanoag, Massasoit, knew his plague-weakened tribe was in serious trouble. But the threat was not the Pilgrims. An aggressive and more powerful tribe, the Narragansetts, would likely subjugate his people. It was not uncommon among North American tribes to kill and torture their rivals, seize their land, enslave their women and children, and on occasion, eat them.
Lost by most is the diplomatic maneuvering that occurred. Massasoit sought out the Pilgrims for a military alliance against another tribe. The Pilgrims entered into a peace treaty with them. The treaty provisions basically said that none of Massasoit’s men would harm the Pilgrims, and if they did, they would be sent to the Pilgrims for punishment and if anyone went to war with Massasoit, the Pilgrims and their flintlocks would come to their aid. Does that sound like colonizing to you?
To be sure, unjust things to native Americans occurred later, but why blame the Pilgrims?
Further, several years later, Massasoit became gravely ill and went blind. The Pilgrims were sent out to visit him and were told he was dead.
But, they found Massasoit alive but near death, and one Edward Winslow gave him medicine, scraped his throat, and gave him chicken soup (no kidding). The chief regained his eyesight, began to eat once again, and recovered.
Grateful for the care, Massasoit revealed a plot by other Indians to wipe out the Pilgrims. Armed with this vital intelligence, Miles Standish, with the help of Massasoit’s men, defeated the plot before it could materialize. Massasoit remained a friend of the Pilgrims until his death. Does that sound like colonizing to you?
What are the odds that the primitive medicine practiced by the Pilgrims could work such miracles on Massasoit and that he, in turn, would reveal a plot by other Indians to destroy the Pilgrims?
Isn’t it interesting that those today who hate the idea of migrants from Europe landing in North America are the ones in favor of migrants displacing the people in Texas and Arizona?
And as to the Indian leaders today who take to the Washington Post to voice their regrets about helping the Pilgrims, both the Post and the Indian leaders are guilty of “presentism”, or view all historical events through the prism of today’s woke ideology.
Both sides cooperated with each other for good reason. They needed each other for survival. It might not be too much to say that descendants today of the Wampanoag might not be around to criticize the Pilgrims were it not for the alliance formed between Massasoit and the Europeans.
Finally, in the diary of William Bradford, we learn about another challenge the Pilgrims beat. This is one of their own makings. It was socialism.
At first, all production was to be shared, regardless of one’s effort. Individuals farmed collective land. As a result, production dropped and starvation stalked the land. There was no incentive to work. Basically, it was “universal basic income”. Bradford reversed course, allowing private plots and making individuals responsible for themselves. The Pilgrims were not only saved by Squanto, but by capitalism.
So there is a lot of interesting history in the back story to Thanksgiving to reflect upon if you can get through the distortions so frequently pedaled today. Even the nature of history itself is a subject of the Thanksgiving experience. It is said that history is written by the victors. Today, it is written by the victors on behalf of the losers.
The Pilgrims put much of their history down in writing. The natives used oral history. The quality of the two is not equivalent. It is hard enough to get the facts straight and interpreted fairly from original written documents. But oral history has no objective tether to the facts. Just listening to the yarns of relatives should prove that to you. Ever notice how events you were party to get changed over the years, embellished sometimes beyond recognition?
Try to have an accurate depiction of events passed on down from 400 years ago. It is just not possible. This truth is likely painful to those that revere “oral history.”
No, the Pilgrims were not perfect, but they were not devils either. The treaty with the Wampanoag, initiated by Massasoit is evidence of that, as was their medical care of him.
It is not a good thing for a nation to have every element of its history turned into an evil crime. A strong civilization should be able to critique itself, but constant exaggeration and selective negative history can undermine belief in one’s country and civilization. Why defend it, if that is the case?
A nation’s history is not solely defined by its shortcomings, nor is its destiny. The Pilgrims conducted themselves pretty well given the time in which they lived.
Those who want to undermine America use distortions of history for their own purposes.
Thanksgiving is actually a remarkable and improbable story. It either was divine intervention or one of the most implausible sets of circumstances one can imagine.
Those actually participating in the events were religious and saw their salvation in religious terms. Their survival hung on a miraculous set of events.
Today, we can look back at the development of a wonderful country that has its warts to be sure, but still remains a beacon to those who want to find a better life.
We have not been wiped out by war, disease, socialism, or starvation. Lots of people have had that fate. We haven’t. Be thankful for that.